Exposing Liberalism’s secret doctrine of hate

Albert Schweitzer observed: "Humanitarianism consists in never sacrificing a human being to a purpose."

When stripped of its lofty rhetoric and feigned humanitarianism, Liberalism is exposed as a doctrine of hate. When we look past the Hollywood smiles and the smarmy car-salesman conviviality of polished political players we find that Liberalism is ultimately rooted in unacknowledged autophobia (self-hatred). Psychological transference expresses autophobia as misanthropy (hatred of others).

If these characteristics were the only elements of their disorder, the misery they create would be private and self-inflicted. But the eventual abomination of the Liberal dogma is its chief tenet of altruism (the premise that one’s value is measured only in their usefulness to others). When combined with hatred of self and others, altruism provides ample justification for all manner of abuse – along with the rationale for any atrocity committed “for the greater good.” In other words altruism; the core tenet of Liberalism is in fact, the sacrifice of human beings to a purpose.

The Liberal doctrine attracts two kinds of apostles: Those whose predominant autophobia makes them willing sacrifices; and those whose misanthropy equips them to sacrifice others. Binding them together is the dogma of altruism. Operating under the dysfunction of autophobia/misanthropy on one side and the self-abdication of altruism on the other, Liberals must obtain external validation for their cognitive dissonance by inflicting their paradox on everyone else.

At times altruism justifies their dominance of others; at other times it compels their submission. At no time does their autophobia allow them to acknowledge how their dominance is self-serving. Neither does their misanthropy allow them to admit that their victims deserve to choose their own values and freely pursue them. At all times their altruism reduces them and everyone else to mere commodities; to be expended for the “good of society:” an ephemeral standard that can be expediently redefined to rationalize any act.

To help visualize how this doctrine plays out, the population can be divided into two general categories – those who hate and mistrust themselves and so hate and mistrust everyone else (the Collectivists); and those who love and trust themselves and so are capable of loving and objectively and independently judging the trustworthiness of others (the Individualists). Collectivists are addicted to control. Individualists are devoted to Liberty.

Generally, Collectivists (Liberals) end up as criminals. Due to the need for external validation and basic cowardice typical of this character flaw, many gravitate to crime’s most officious and impervious class: government. Individualists (Libertarians) are those who exercise confident self-determination and enlightened self-interest; engage in productive activities and cultivate mutually beneficial, voluntary relationships; build real prosperity and generally make society work. They are also those upon whom criminals (both private and public) seek to feed. Does this distinction imply that there are no Individualists in government? No, but it does explain how they often seem out of place in that setting – Ron Paul being the most obvious current example.

Liberals claim to help the needy. They do this by taking from the productive members of society and giving to the non-productive members setting themselves up as the sole judges of “excessive wealth” and “need.” The “wealthy” and the “needy” alike are sacrificed to the Liberal creed; because of two systemic flaws in the Liberal agenda. First; by taking resources from those who are productive, they hinder the expansion of real wealth that creates opportunity for employment that can help the “needy” fulfill their own needs and also provide private capital to support those needing permanent assistance due to disability.

Second, by distributing these misallocated resources through bureaucracy, they create a wholly new class of dependents. This new category; (the Liberal politician and the social services bureaucrat); have a vested interest in keeping people dependent. Whereas without government “help” in the first place, the truly needy can obtain temporary help through direct charity, family, friends and neighbors, and have a natural incentive to become independent as soon as possible. The Liberal assertion that only through official government aid can the needy truly be taken care of is no more valid than the presumption that government assistance really helps.

Finally – the ultimate act of degradation – their “help” is offered in a manner that implies the inferiority of the beneficiaries. This condescension; most obviously expressed in Affirmative Action; actually reinforces the stigma of inferiority that it claims to counteract. Overall, the relationship between the “helper” bureaucracies and the “needy” recipients transforms the recipients from potentially capable humans into subhuman parasites; and the converts the politicians and bureaucrats from public servants to the moral equivalent of drug pushers.

The unobstructed charitable process is a natural expression of human virtue, benevolence, gratitude and love which unites people, promotes independence and enriches all involved. The prosperous freely participate to express their gratitude for their abundance; their compassion for those in trouble; and their love of themselves and their neighbors.

The needy who receive direct charity often have the benefit of putting a face or name with the act of kindness. This relationship facilitates genuine gratitude and encourages those who can to better themselves to avoid being an unnecessary burden. Conveniently, personal contact between the needy and the charitable also helps the unemployed or disabled connect with others to help them become independent.

Into this sublime, mutually gratifying and enriching relationship, the arrogant, condescending, holier-than-thou Liberal politician; and his soulless minion, the bureaucrat intrude. They claim the right to take from the prosperous by force, creating animosity and greed where there was once gratitude and generosity.

They claim the right to set the definition of “needy,” and determine the compensation paid to those unlucky enough to fit that category. They call this process “entitlement” instantly redefining charity as a legal obligation and assistance as a legal right.

They declare that the prosperous owe the needy simply by the fact of their relative success – and that the needy, merely by the fact of their lack, are entitled to an arbitrarily determined portion of others’ lawfully acquired private property.

They advertise that the needy are victimized by the prosperous, workers are exploited by employers and the rich attain their status on the backs of the poor. Where once there was gratitude, they sew envy.

Where once there was pride, they plant shame. Where once there was encouragement, they inject animosity. Where once there was admiration, they foment hatred. This perversion does not result from the virtue of their advertised goals; but from their unacknowledged hatred of goodness. This subconscious loathing undermines whatever goodness they intend; debauches the virtuous, slanders the wealthy; enslaves the independent and reduces human dignity to the actualization of the emptiness in spirit, confusion of mind and weakness of body that are the rotten fruit of Liberal doctrine.

The victory of the Liberal dogma of death cannot be accomplished by attacking the mighty or directly challenging the virtuous, for their crusaders are cowardly and impotent. Instead, their method is to exalt the mediocre and enshrine the mundane, and in so doing, they surreptitiously mitigate the value of exceptionalism. If the beggar and the entrepreneur are equal; if the priest and the con artist are the same; when the statesman and the mugger are equal; if the virgin and the crack whore are equivalent, then virtue is hollow, integrity is meaningless and objective value is worthless.

A populace conditioned by the axioms of subjective relativism is fodder for the Liberal “utopia.” When values are no longer relevant, then virtue can be whatever the Collectivist priesthood says it is. Healing the sick and sending people to extermination camps can both be done for the “good of society.” Earning money through voluntary exchange of real value can be equivalent to stealing – if it is done for the “right reasons” by the “right people” with official power. Violating the Constitution and obliterating inalienable individual Rights is OK if there is a “crisis.” Killing babies is “good” as long as it is called “reproductive choice.”

This is the goal of Liberalism’s secret doctrine of hate: to erase from the public conscience any notion of absolute value, unconditional worth, non-negotiable standards or inalienable rights. And they are far closer to their goal than we believe – mostly because we have been conditioned over generations to lower our threshold of tolerance for their foggy, “shades of gray morality” and universally-degrading egalitarianism.

But despite their ability to warp perceptions and distort logic, they can never change reality. They cannot make evil wholesome or create one dime of value by theft. Those of us who see the evil at the heart of their agenda must stand for truth, fight for justice and send this heinous ideology, with its intransigent devotees back to the hell from which they oozed.

We can do this more easily than it seems, because this doctrine of death; although backed by laws, institutions, media support, money and guns is really only a paper tiger. It has no real power except that which we give it. Its illusion is entirely dependent on stealing from us that which it gives back to us. We the People are its source, its strength and its substance. And We the People can and will survive and thrive without it, but it cannot exist without us.

Withdraw your sanction!

Withhold your support!

Starve the beast of the only substance it has – our belief, our will, our wealth!

If we succeed in liberating ourselves from this doctrine of hate, we will earn the right to proudly tell our grandchildren how our generation saved America and the world from its evil. Just as our fathers and grandfathers helped defeat Nazi Germany and Soviet Russia, we will be deserving of the American heritage. The world was made for the just, but from time to time must be won by the mighty as well. As long as justice and might are aligned, humanitarianism will assure that no person is ever sacrificed to a purpose.